THE USE OF ARABIC AND PERSIAN DERIVED WORDS IN LITERARY WORKS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines stylistic, semantic, and derivational functions of Arabic and Persian derivatives in Uzbek literary discourse. It highlights the interaction of the Turkic core with the Eastern layer and the productivity of -iy/-iyat, -noma, -goh, -shunos, -kor. Theoretical grounds draw on Haugen, Weinreich, Vinogradov, and Uzbek scholarship.
Article Details
References
Haugen, E. (1950). The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210–231.
Weinreich, U. (1968). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.
Vinogradov, V. V. (1963). O yazyke khudozhestvennoy literatury [On the Language of Fiction]. Moscow: Nauka.
Baskakov, N. A. (1962). Vvedeniye v izucheniye tyurkskikh yazykov [Introduction to the Study of Turkic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.
Rahmatullayev, Sh. (1978). O‘zbek tili leksikologiyasi [Lexicology of the Uzbek Language]. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi.
Qosimov, B., & Umurov, A. (1993). O‘zbek adabiy tili tarixi [History of the Uzbek Literary Language]. Tashkent: Fan.