LINGUOPRAGMATIC FEATURES OF INSULTING SPEECH IN DIGITAL DISCOURSE AND CRITERIA FOR LINGUISTIC EXPERT EXAMINATION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the linguistic, linguopragmatic, and discursive features of insulting speech on social media through an integrated approach. It explores the mechanisms through which insults are expressed at the lexical-semantic, morphological, syntactic-pragmatic, graphic-orthographic, and multimodal levels in digital communication. Particular attention is paid to explicit and implicit forms of insult, irony, sarcasm, stereotyping, provocative speech, and derogatory expressions conveyed through visual signs. The article also considers the criteria for distinguishing insulting speech from criticism, emotionally charged swearing, threats, and defamatory statements.
Article Details
References
Austin J.L. How to Do Things with Words. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. 168 p.
Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. – 345 p.
Council of Europe. Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers on “hate speech”. – Strasbourg, 1997.
Culpeper J. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. – 292 p.
ElSherief M., Kulkarni V., Nguyen D., Wang W.Y., Belding E. Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Media // Proceedings of ICWSM. – 2018.
O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. 5 jildlik. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi, 2020. – 5-jild. – B. 473.
Majidova R.U., Muhiddinova X.S., Sultonova Sh.M. Tilshunoslikka kirish. – Toshkent, 2015. – 6 b.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Sud ekspertizasi to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuniga o‘zgartirish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish haqida”gi Qonun, 2024-yil 26-avgust, 945-son.