FROM LEXEME TO DISCOURSE: DERIVATIONAL PRAGMATICS IN FRENCH AND UZBEK
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the pragmatic implications of affixal derivation within discourse, particularly focusing on French and Uzbek languages. Through a comprehensive linguistic analysis, it discusses how derived morphological forms acquire pragmatic nuances within specific contexts such as media, social networks, and legal texts. Employing discursive analysis, this study illustrates how the choice of affixes directly shapes meaning, speaker intention, and audience interpretation. Examples from both languages reveal how morphological processes serve as pragmatic markers, enhancing communicative effectiveness. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of derivational morphology as a strategic resource in discourse construction and pragmatic interaction.
Article Details
References
Charaudeau, P. (2005). Langage et discours. Paris: Hachette, pp. 63 – 85.
Dressler, W. U. (2005). Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German and other languages. Mouton de Gruyter.
Ducrot, O. (1984). Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit, pp. 157 – 178.
Fradin, B. (2003). La morphologie constructionnelle. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 115 – 142.
Hakimov, M. (2013). O‘zbek pragmalingvistikasi asoslari. Tashkent: Fan, pp. 72 – 90.
Katamba, F., & Stonham, J. (2006). Morphology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2005). Le discours en interaction. Paris: Armand Colin, pp. 35 – 58.
Madjidova, D. (2023). “The Study of Discourse Pragmatics in Uzbek Official Texts.” Pragmatics & Society, 14(2), pp. 195 – 213.
Maingueneau, D. (2012). Discours et analyse du discours. Paris: PUF, pp. 101 – 128.
Rahmatov, A. (2016). O‘zbek tilining amaliy pragmatikasi. Tashkent: Akademiya, pp. 110 – 138.
Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika. Tashkent: Fan, pp. 23 – 47.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.